Comments on: a being than which a greater is inconceivable http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/ Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:08:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: system administrator http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-17 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:52 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-17 Tack, Doktorn & Anders för era sjysta förklaringar. Är existens en egenskap? Tack, Doktorn & Anders för era sjysta förklaringar.
Är existens en egenskap?

]]> by: Anders Lundblad http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-16 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:08:46 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-16 Anselm is saying (I think), that factual existence is the most perfect property of an object. And if you agree that an infinitely perfect being is conceivable, you must also admit that such a being exists. Otherwise that which you are imagining is not perfect, because if it were, it would by necessity exist (based on his premise, that existence is the most perfect property). Anselm is saying (I think), that factual existence is the most perfect property of an object. And if you agree that an infinitely perfect being is conceivable, you must also admit that such a being exists. Otherwise that which you are imagining is not perfect, because if it were, it would by necessity exist (based on his premise, that existence is the most perfect property).

]]> by: system administrator (z) http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-15 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:02:19 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-15 :) He basically says that: "it's better to exist BOTH in reality and in fantasy, than only in fantasy". And since this being is the best and greatest, it has got the greatest kind of existence. :)
He basically says that:
“it’s better to exist BOTH in reality and in fantasy, than only in fantasy”.

And since this being is the best and greatest, it has got the greatest kind of existence.

]]> by: Anders Rasmussen http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-14 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:06:16 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-14 What does this mean in English? As far as I know there is nothing wrong with my IQ, but I have never really understood that argument... What does this mean in English? As far as I know there is nothing wrong with my IQ, but I have never really understood that argument…

]]> by: system administrator http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-13 Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:30:15 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-13 :) :)

]]> by: Doktorn http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-12 Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:28:56 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-12 Att tänka på det högsta tänkbara väsendet är att tänka på något som existerar med nödvändighet, tycks Anselm mena. (Att tänka på Pegasus är däremot inte att tänka på något som existerar med nödvändighet.) Att tänka på det högsta tänkbara väsendet är att tänka på något som existerar med nödvändighet, tycks Anselm mena. (Att tänka på Pegasus är däremot inte att tänka på något som existerar med nödvändighet.)

]]> by: system administrator http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-11 Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:23:36 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-11 ...men hur blir "tänkbart" plötsligt "nödvändigt"? …men hur blir “tänkbart” plötsligt “nödvändigt”?

]]> by: Doktorn http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-10 Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:55:00 +0100 http://enklabloggen.blogsome.com/2007/04/23/a-being-than-which-a-greater-is-inconceivable/#comment-10 Alltså: Om begreppet "det högsta tänkbara väsendet" blott är begripligt, följer att Gud existerar, enligt Anselm, ty i sådana fall har vi ett begrepp om något som med nödvändighet existerar i verkligheten. Alltså: Om begreppet “det högsta tänkbara väsendet” blott är begripligt, följer att Gud existerar, enligt Anselm, ty i sådana fall har vi ett begrepp om något som med nödvändighet existerar i verkligheten.

]]>